In the early days of the financial crisis, I raised the issue of whether or not secure lending can take place when the quality of collateral erodes. Currently, much collateral has shifted from the heavy iron of factories, land and equipment to more ephemeral forms: hard-to-value intangibles like software, patents, human capital, and the like. See Collateral Damage. Until recently, I had not given much thought to this shift. Then, within the space of several recent days, three articles appeared which have questioned the solidity of the underlying collateral which now purport to support our vast financial lending pyramid:
- Is 2012 a Reprise of 2008? – Charles Hugh Smith
- No Freedom – No Money – No Markets – Bill Buckler
- Bernanke and Germany Wake up to a Merda Storm – Russ Winters
The essence of these articles: financial institutions, and more importantly the central banks of governments, are sitting on a vast amount of seriously devalued or worthless collateral. In layman’s language regarding this flawed empire of debt: “the emperor has no clothes.”
The LTRO Program
The Long Term Refinancing Operation (“LTRO”) is a program of the European Central Bank (“ECB”). This program permits unlimited lending to banks and, importantly, relaxes acceptable forms of collateral. Its purpose was to relieve worsening credit conditions in Europe. See LTRO: A User’s Manual for a more complete discussion. Although initially greeted with acclaim and stock and bond market rallies both in Europe and the US, its effect quickly wore off.
Italian banks took €354 billion in LTRO cash and Spanish banks took around €300 billion. Portuguese bank dependence on ECB borrowing rose to a record €56 billion. So in total, these countries’ insolvent banks have now placed over €710 billion in merda collateral with the ECB. The fact that these infected banks are halting trading about every other day should also be transmitting in spades the signal that the ECB literally owns said banks and inherits their losses and their merda collateral, which has been pawned off.
In truth, only four European countries backstop all of the ECB, EFSF [“European Financial Stabilization Fund” edit.], and other schemes. Unfortunately, two of them are the “merda-storm” (per Russ Winters’ coined term) countries of Spain and Italy. That means all of the losses that would normally be distributed across a number of larger nations will now fall on the remaining two: Germany and France. See Bernanke and Germany Wake up to a Merda Storm (“merda” is Latin for excrement or dung).
The Crumbling Pyramid
Charles Hugh Smith’s recent article succinctly describes the trigger for the Great Financial Crisis: “…the collateral that supported this great inverted pyramid of leveraged debt vanished, and as a result the entire pyramid crumbled.” See Is 2012 a Reprise of 2008? Since that time the government has played a game of “extend and pretend.” Governments and their central bank agents are pumping up asset markets to deflect our suspicion that dubious collateral is supporting the debt pyramid.
Mr. Smith gives the all too real example of a $500,000 house purchased by a subprime buyer with only 3% down ($15,000). The homeowner is thus leveraged 33-1. Banks in turn packaged outrageously unsound mortgages like this one into mortgage backed securities (“MBS”), and then used these amalgamated pieces of financial trash as collateral for yet more loans. Further, the banks then wrote credit derivatives on these securities and further expanded the inverted debt pyramid. When the real estate market rises, all is well: buyer, bank, MBS holder, and derivative purchaser all get bailed out. However, when the real estate market falls, the financial implosion of a Great Financial Crisis ensues.
The banks refuse to deal with the underlying problem. Instead, they rely on financial games. Thus, in the above example:
… the mortgage is still valued on the books at $450,000, but the actual collateral — the house — is only worth $250,000. The idea being pursued by central banks around the world is that if they pump enough free money and liquidity into the system, and buy up impaired debt (i.e. debt in which the collateral has vanished), then the illusion that there is still some actual collateral holding up the market can be maintained. See Is 2012 a Reprise of 2008?
Moments of Realization
Bill Buckler highlights the first moment of realization that collateral was irrevocably impaired. During the Bear Stearns crisis, two of its hedge subprime hedge funds lost nearly all of their value due to the rapid decline in the subprime mortgage market. To deal with the crisis Bear Stearns sought to sell the collateralized debt obligation in its funds:
For the one and only time in the GFC so far, a money centre bank tried to sell Collateralised Debt Obligations (CDOs) on an actual market. That attempt lasted hours. When the auction was closed, the bids were coming in at 30 percent of the face value of the paper. The jig was up, the valuation of the collateral underpinning the entire banking system was revealed as fictitious. (Emphasis in article) Not much more than a year later, that collateral was transferred from the US banking SYSTEM to the Fed, which has maintained its fictitious “value” ever since. See No Freedom – No Money – No Markets
Mimicking the Federal Reserve, The European Central Bank is now accepting impaired collateral, including rapidly declining sovereign debt from Italy and Spain. The dangerous fiction continues.
Are We About to Revisit the GFC of 2008?
The real question is whether or not we are about to reprise the Great Financial Crisis of 2008. I would strongly suggest that Ben Bernanke and others are aware of the tenuous nature of the current iteration of the financial system. Clearly Bernanke and company are self protecting:
Tying all the loose ends together is Wizard of Oz Ben Bernanke’s sudden attention to words like “shadow banking,” “collateral” and “vulnerabilities” in his speeches. For those with an elementary ability to connect the dots, this suggests that collateral in general — including the merda-storm variety — has been the subject of some late-night calls during Weekend at Benny’s.
And then there’s Ben, the master of obfuscation and butt covering. When this crisis hits, Ben will attempt to disassociate the bad collateral as a European problem and nothing with which he would ever be involved. He will argue that owning several trillion in 1-2%-yielding long-duration sovereigns in a country (the US) with a 105% debt to GDP is nothing like what the ECB has done. A few years ago, a trillion-dollar portfolio of housing mortgages would have been considered a big deal. See Bernanke and Germany Wake up to a Merda Storm
Paraphrasing the author, Daniel Silva, only idiots and dead men ignore coincidences. Three articles suddenly and recently appear which discuss the issue of impaired collateral supporting a vast financial inverted debt pyramid. Coincidentally, the last time this confluence of warnings happened was 2008. Turned out, the emperor was buck naked then. Is 2012 a reprise for our sartorially and financially challenged emperor?
loading...