Posts Tagged: Chrysler


19
Mar 10

Is the Administration Determined to Make the Elderly Poor?

We have created a handout and bailout society where every constituency earns a welfare payment. Here is a partial list from Obama world:

Bear Stearns 2008 – As the financial giant neared collapse, JP Morgan Chase and the federal government bailed out Bear Stearns. JP Morgan bought it for   $236 million and the Federal Reserve ensured the sale with a $30 billion credit line. Taxpayer cost – $30 billion

Fannie Mae / Freddie Mac 2008 – On Sep. 7, 2008, Fannie and Freddie were placed under the conservatorship of the Federal Housing Finance Agency; i.e. under the terms of the rescue, they were effectively nationalized. , The Treasury has invested billions to cover the companies’ losses. Initially, Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson set an investment ceiling of $100 billion each.  In February, Tim Geithner raised that tab to $200 billion. While the money was authorized by the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008, by Executive Order we have unlimited taxpayer liability.  Taxpayer cost so far – $400 billion

American International Group (A.I.G.) 2008 - On four separate occasions, the government offered aid to AIG to keep it from collapsing, beginning with an $85 billion credit line from the Federal Reserve to a combined $180 billion between the Treasury ($70 billion) and Fed ($110 billion). $40 billion of this Treasury commitment is also included in the TARP total. Taxpayer cost – $180 billion

Auto Industry 2008 – In late September 2008, Congress approved a more than $630 billion spending bill, which included a measure for $25 billion in auto industry loans. These low-interest loans are primarily intended to aid the Detroit Big Three (GM, Ford, Chrysler) in their push to build more fuel-efficient, environmentally-friendly vehicles.  Taxpayer cost – to be determined.

See History of US Gov’t Bailouts

In addition to the bailouts, economic stimulus measures purportedly saved millions of public and private sector jobs.  For those workers not “saved” by Obama’s stimulus measures, Congress extended unemployment benefits.

Punishing the Elderly

One significant group has not benefitted from Obama’s ubiquitous fiscal largesse.  A consequence of Administration policy is the growing impoverishment of the American elderly.   Let’s examine Bernanke’s and Geithner’s handiwork:

  • Interest rate Policy – Zero interest rate policies penalize the elderly.  After a lifetime of savings the elderly may be lucky to earn one percent on their savings.  Of course, they are welcome to gamble in the stock market casino.  Unfortunately the last ten years have shown no return on stock market investments and the public has been traumatized by two major bear markets.
  • Social Security Cost of Living Adjustments (COLAs) – The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) massaged COLAs to penalize the elderly.  John Williams at shadowstats.com has consistently pointed out how the Bureau has tortured the consumer price index to avoid reflecting its actual upward movement. Mr. Williams estimates that the effective annual consumer price index (CPI) has risen 9.76% v. the BLS-reported 2.63%.See Protecting Profits from the Apparent Recovery
  • Health Care – Medicare reimbursements to physicians have been cut 21%.  This will compromise the quality and availability of medical care.
  • Employment – Given the high levels of unemployment and meager job growth, the elderly have limited opportunities to reenter the workforce.

The Non-Barking Dog?

Are the elderly the new silent majority? Where are the militant Gray Panthers of yester year? The strangely quiet AARP and the elderly should be bombarding Congress with emails and letters publicizing their plight.

Are the elderly the dogs that don’t bark? They should be howling right now! And by the way, the elderly do vote. In key states like Florida, Texas, Arizona and California they are powerful constituencies.

With excesses like the above, the elderly and almost elderly should be barking like crazy.  And with their votes and voices, these aging children of the sixties know how to bite as well.

GD Star Rating
loading...
  • Share/Bookmark

18
Jan 10

Government Intervention and Bowmar Brains

In 1971, Indiana-based Bowmar Instruments introduced the first hand-held LED (Light Emitting Diode) calculator.  The “Bowmar Brain” was a huge success.  Other manufacturers developed cheaper calculators, and when the company could no longer compete, it went bankrupt in 1976.

What if the Government Intervened?

Starting with Chrysler in the 1970’s to GM and Chrysler in 2009 government has intervened to either prevent bankruptcy (Chrysler) or to distort the bankruptcy process (GM and Chrysler).  It has justified its intervention by touting the vital importance of these businesses to economic recovery, the need for jobs in severely depressed Midwestern states or national security.

What if the government had intervened in the Bowmar bankruptcy? After all, the first hand-held LED calculator was economically important to both Texas and Indiana.  Texas Instruments supplied Bowmar’s calculator chips.  Further, the hand-held calculator and LED technologies had important scientific and military importance.

In 2010, it seems absurd to even raise the possibility that government should have “saved” Bowmar.  However, we know from our current circumstance that government is whimsical and has indeed prevented private entities from going bankrupt.  This prompts us to consider “what if?”

In the 1970’s calculators were expensive: more than $100 for a Bowmar and $500 or more for HP business and scientific models.  Government intervention would have kept prices artificially high.  Today calculators are included at no extra cost in the basic Windows computer package and banks give away inexpensive calculators as promotional items.

Government intervention would have stunted development of LED technology. Today LED technology is ubiquitous; it is used in signage, energy efficient illumination and in photo optical applications such as remote controls.  See Wikipedia LED. Would the government have been able to innovate?  I would suggest not.

The Heavy Hand of Government

Today we witness the spectacle of the government intervening in numerous traditionally private activities:

  • Banks
  • Money Market Funds
  • Auto Manufacturers
  • Health Care
  • Mortgage Lending

Even conceding that the current Administration never intended to socialize broad swaths of private industry, the speed and scope of current federal involvement has put us on exactly that road. Financial media and the White House credit these measures with saving the economy and condition us to accept government solutions to private economic problems. This role is more than that of a regulator.  Government has become a major operator in direct competition with other domestic and foreign private enterprises.

What is the Real Cost?

One cost is the recent proposed special tax on large banks who accepted TARP funds. Government largesse is an inappropriate “free lunch,” but even this mistake is not the greatest harm.  Government intervention encourages investment based on political rather than economic considerations.  Did we really solve the problem of costly union collective bargaining agreements when the government took control of Chrysler and GM?  That would have jeopardized union support for Administration policies. See The Greediest Generation – Where Has Shared Sacrifice Gone?

Will these companies produce cars that consumers want to buy, or cars that meet the government’s environmental agenda?  The heavy hand of government will ultimately stifle all industries that it touches.   In the health care industry, this is of more than academic interest. We may pay with our lives.

If current governmental policy was in force in 1976, we all might be using very expensive and very large hand-held Bowmar Brains.  It is a worrisome trend that we should all be concerned about.

GD Star Rating
loading...
  • Share/Bookmark