Posts Tagged: FBI


10
May 10

A False Sense of Security

Since Bismarck introduced social insurance in 1881 social welfare states have proliferated.   While Americans pride themselves on self-reliance, our social security system is Bismarck’s creation, incarnated fifty years later during the New Deal.  Expanding its parameters, we have created recipient constituencies, extended unemployment, health care, food stamps.  We have extended welfare programs to banks, insurance companies, industrial and automotive companies.  Our tax code is permeated with incentives to buy houses, cars, environmentally sound products, dividends, etc.

This week, Europe and America have a chance to look into the abyss and envision an end to the social welfare state.  The financial upheaval in Greece dramatically exposes the fallacy of the social welfare state and the Keynesian economics from which it sprung.

The Roots of the Financial Crisis

Modern economic interventionist governments created a false sense of security.   How did we get here?   The New Deal and its progeny are not inherently evil, as those on the right would like us to believe.  Roosevelt, Johnson, Kennedy and Obama faced harsh economic realities and acted from only the best impulses to ameliorate real hardships in the citizenry.  However, cheap money and a tangle of unaffordable social programs send false signals.  The tangle encourages people to take foolish risks.  And it falsely promises that Big Government can be an economic and social savior.

The Emperor Has No Clothes

The Great Financial Crisis should bring home the fact the government cannot protect us.  When the crisis hit we learned a number of disturbing facts:

-          Banks and buyers committed rampant mortgage fraud.

-          Banks operating under the nose of the FDIC were insolvent.

-          The SEC endorsed rating agencies, which in turn manufactured unwarranted AAA ratings.

-          The Executive branch ignored FBI warnings about  an “epidemic” of mortgage fraud.

-          Cheap money flowed from the Federal Reserve and inflated asset bubbles in house prices, commercial real estate, and stock prices.

-          The SEC, the Federal Reserve and other agencies permitted excessive leverage. This ultimately destroyed Lehman, Bear Stearns, AIG and others.

Despite the frantic attempts of the current Administration to pass financial reform legislation, the Bush and Obama administrations had more than enough legislative and regulatory power to reign in bad behavior in all the financial markets.  But neither Administration did it.

A Gullible Public

Animals in captivity lose their self protective instincts.  A gullible public lulled into a false sense of security also loses common sense and financial self-protective instincts.  As the crisis grew, Americans were told that social security will enable them to retire, unemployment will bridge any short jobless periods, houses prices will always rise, and stocks are good to buy. With only a little hindsight, we can see how prudent behavior lost out.

The White House and the financial press and broadcast media constantly promoted stock and home purchases. Why are we surprised that the US has one of the lowest savings rates in the Western World?

Greece and the End of the Welfare State

Greece is the wakeup call that we can no longer afford the modern welfare state.  There are too many Greek citizens entitled to government benefits and not enough income producers and taxpayers.  Simply put, the Greek government,  just like the United States government, has insufficient funds to pay for the social welfare state.  Our danger is that unlike Greece, the US has the money-printing press.  The world still views us as a relative safe haven.  But what we are really doing is “extending and pretending” before our American day of financial reckoning.

A Return to Self Reliance

What each of us must do now is to realize that government promises and support are illusory and ultimately fragile.  We need a return to self reliance.  We must be responsible for our own retirements, perform due diligence before investing, save more, spend less and pay down our debts.  Better voluntary austerity then forced austerity with police on horses in full riot gear.

GD Star Rating
loading...
  • Share/Bookmark

14
Sep 09

Why are We Investigating CIA Officers Instead of Bankers?

There are times when the American populace needs to be put through a values clarification exercise. An example: when a charity solicits us for a contribution, we often respond that we cannot afford to give.  What we really mean is that we would rather spend money on a movie, new clothes or a couple of beers. On a macro, social policy basis we also have trouble clarifying our values.  We rail against excessive health care costs, but we do not ban cigarettes or alcohol, or mandate that overweight people all attend Weight Watchers. We have technology to prevent a drunken driver from starting an automobile while inebriated, but after a DWI conviction do we consider mandating that safeguard?

This brings us to the main point: why are we investigating CIA officers instead of bankers?  On Monday August 24th, the New York Times had a front page article heralding that Attorney General Eric Holder was naming a veteran prosecutor to investigate CIA interrogation techniques during the Bush Administration. The purpose of the investigation is to decide whether or not to bring criminal prosecutions. Here is the obligatory disclaimer so human rights advocates can move on and finish reading this piece.  If there are bona fide legal abuses of prisoners’ civil rights, then by all means the Department of Justice, the military or other governmental bodies should thoroughly investigate such abuses and bring criminal cases, if warranted.

The actions of CIA officers should be examined in context.  Post-9-11, the government adopted a philosophical stance on terrorism and the threat to the US homeland.  The stance was that the United States was in mortal danger from jihadists and other terror organizations and, unchecked, these terrorists had the capability of inflicting untold harm on the American public.  Thus, as always, the CIA mandate was to protect the country. Post 9-11, these were extraordinary times and the danger was real and imminent.  Possibly extreme measures were needed to obtain information and protect Americans.

Every intelligence gathering or law enforcement agency probably has a small minority of unbalanced individuals who go overboard in exercising authority. My guess is that 99.99% of CIA, FBI and other agents are professional, disciplined, well-trained patriots acting in good faith and with the highest motives and integrity. These are professionals who give up time with their families on a GS pay scale to protect us. How do we repay them?  Post-hoc, we investigate them.  The average citizen has no idea what this means.  These officials being investigated may have to hire their own attorneys, pay for their defense out of pocket and hope to be reimbursed for these expenditures if exonerated.  This does not take into account the psychological strain on the individual, the public humiliation, opprobrium of friends and neighbors and the strain on families.   Moreover, there is a chilling, trickle down, effect on others in the agency.  No risks will be taken and the best and brightest in the agency will avoid being involved in interrogations. DOJ investigations take a long time and that is one large cloud to be under.

Contrast the treatment of CIA officials with the treatment of the principals in the financial industry who caused the 2008 market meltdown:

  • Rating agencies received a fee from the institutions that were being rated and essentially conspired to inflate ratings to the detriment of investors;
  • Stock brokers did not disclose the riskiness of investment products being sold to investors;
  • Real estate brokers pushed clients into houses they could not afford and conspired with mortgage brokers, banks and clients to obtain bogus financing;
  • Purchasers knowingly falsified their applications as to income and assets to obtain a larger mortgage or any mortgage;
  • Investment bankers took the suspect paper, packaged the paper into collateralized debt obligations and sold them to pension funds;
  • Pension fund managers had a fiduciary duty to investigate what they were buying, but instead chose to reach for a few extra basis points of yield to earn a bigger annual bonus;
  • Lawyers willing created CDOs and derivatives on the CDOs.  They counseled clients to provide the skimpiest of disclosures and misled investors.

The mortgage and housing arena is but one part of the financial meltdown and there are more principals in the financial industry worthy of investigation. But the reality is that few individuals and companies are being investigated. The standard apology for this lapse is that investigations would disrupt the economy.  Who could have really understood the magnitude of these problems? This did not occur during my administration!  Let’s let bygones be bygones.

That approach is too facile and disingenuous for my tastes.  For the average working man the catastrophic result has been lost homes, depleted retirement accounts, broken families and lost dreams.

Who is more deserving of prosecution, members of the financial industry or members of the CIA?  Patriots versus Scoundrels.   People who tried to save lives versus people who destroyed lives. People earning a GS pay scale versus Goldman Sachs executives scheduled to share in $11.4 billion in bonuses for the first six months of 2009.  A values clarification moment –you decide!

GD Star Rating
loading...
  • Share/Bookmark