Posts Tagged: FDIC


13
May 10

Lack of Skepticism and Imagination Can Be Harmful to Your Financial Health

Ron Geffner, a lawyer and hedge fund expert, was a recent guest on Bloomberg’s Hays Advantage.  He commented that one of the causes of the financial crisis was that investors were lulled into a false sense of security.  (See A False Sense of Security).  My corollary observation is the striking lack of investor imagination, skepticism or integrated thinking.

We have become a task focused society.  Much of the work in large corporations is task- or project-based.  Common business phrases reinforce this short sighted focus on immediate outcomes: “singular focus,” “eyes on the prize,” “mission critical” “pedal to the metal” and “full court press.”  These idioms reveal a true but unspoken agenda:  put blinders on and accomplish the task at hand.  Thus, in the interest of efficiency and rapid results, do not prioritize the long term, which takes much more imagination and thoughtfulness.  Let’s look at how a lack of imagination can be harmful not only to our personal net worth, but also to any notion of greater or societal good.

What Were They Thinking?

Group think can be a tourniquet around one’s mind, or if you will, intellectual tunnel vision.  Focused on outcome, we brush aside unintended or negative consequences, or worse we don’t even consider them. Let’s look at some of the group think that ushered in the current state of economic distress:

Exotic Securities – Without understanding what they were buying, why were investors involved with collateralized debt obligations, interest rate swaps, auction rate securities and other exotica?  Why were brokers and bankers selling these securities when even they did not understand them?  See e.g., Fabulous Fab’s s emails.

Counterparty Risk – When making a large bet, one wants to make sure the bookie can make good on the bet.  In the financial world, investors did not consider that counter parties (the bookie in the analogy) could be a bankrupt Northern Rock, Bear Stearns or Lehman.

Credit Agencies –When banks paid credit rating agencies and often worked with them to improve ratings, why were investors surprised that those ratings (AAA no less) were in fact false?  Today, NY Attorney General, Andrew Cuomo opened an investigation of bank fraud in obtaining ratings. Prosecutors Ask if 8 Banks Duped Rating Agencies.

Housing – When agencies pay mortgage brokers on the basis of dollar volume, why are we surprised that those brokers colluded with homeowners to qualify the unqualified?  When we created exotic mortgages such as interest only, no documentation loans, and option ARMs is it surprising that homeowners default in droves?  Why didn’t investors, brokers or homeowners ever question the prevailing assumption spouted by leading bankers and public figures that house prices always increase?

The FIRE Economy and Outsourced Jobs – Why did leading economists not question the viability of an economy based heavily on Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate?   Our economy has always been at its most prosperous based on strong domestic production of goods and services.  As we were outsourcing jobs and freezing wages for workers why did no economist raise the question of why a recession would not result from the decline in good paying US jobs?

Katrina and the Regulatory Environment – Katrina was a wakeup call that the laissez faire Bush Administration could lead to disastrous consequences.  Why did investment analysts, Congress and the media not question the ineffectiveness of key government regulators such as the Securities and Exchange Commission, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Federal Reserve and others?   Failure to enforce the laws and regulations on the books has had disastrous consequences for investors.

Private Equity – Corporations such as Chrysler and GMAC were deeply flawed before their failures.   Why did we not question how a private equity firm could improve on existing managements?

Programmed Trading – Why are we not surprised when 25 year olds put in charge of computer trading programs that trade against other computer programs can crash the market 1000 Dow points in several minutes?

Sovereign Debt – Why are we surprised that we now question the creditworthiness of nations such as Portugal, Ireland, Italy, and Greece, Spain and even the UK and US, when governments respond to the financial crisis by absorbing the private debt problems of the banks?

Human Nature

It is human nature to dislike hearing bad news.  Sometimes it takes a little imagination to conjure up negative consequences.  Maybe it is my legal training, but I tend to look at my downside risk before I look at the upside.  The public should have been a lot less trusting in some very flawed institutions: banks, brokers, mutual funds, traders, real estate agents, the SEC, the Federal Reserve and others.  Unfortunately, one consequence of an uncritical financial media is that presenting a cavalcade of financial “experts” without harsh questioning only reinforces misplaced trust and zero imagination.

We need to encourage some imagination and a whole lot of skepticism before we reach the other side of the Great Financial Crisis and try to stay there.

GD Star Rating
loading...
  • Share/Bookmark

12
Dec 09

Perverse Incentives

Government has distorted our economic choices.  Through pumping irrational amounts of liquidity, the economy has stabilized for the moment.  However, we live in a post apocalyptic financial world wherein this interference has created perverse incentives.  Some examples:

  • Free Car Rentals from GM

Why rent a car from Avis or Hertz?   GM, now owned by the US government and financed through its generous checkbook, permits a buyer to drive a newly purchased car for 60 days, travel up to 4,000 miles and return the car for a full refund for any reason (GM 60-Day Satisfaction Guarantee). Doesn’t this put non-government owned auto manufacturers at a significant disadvantage?

  • Can’t Qualify for a Private Mortgage?  Try the FHA

To stem the decline in house prices, the FHA has stepped in to make loans that no sensible private party would make.  Buyers can put as little as 3.5% down.  (In “What does the FHA think it is doing?” – One buyer borrowed from her retirement account to fund the 3.5% down payment).  Didn’t we get into the financial crisis through sub- prime lending?  As a footnote, a former FHA official projects the agency is more than $54b underwater on its portfolio and is expected to need a major taxpayer bailout.

  • Why Lend Money When You Can Earn Risk Free Returns Courtesy of the Fed?

The Federal Reserve has adopted a zero interest rate policy and promises to keep it in place for an extended period of time.  Complementing its zero interest rate policy, the Fed now pays interest on excess reserves kept on deposit with them.  In a recessionary economy it is risky to lend money to private borrowers.   Why lend in the real economy, when you can borrow at zero percent, redeposit the money to earn interest on these Fed reserves, and pocket the differential?  This risk free maneuver is a disincentive for banks to lend to borrowers.  Isn’t the Obama administration trying to stimulate the real economy through lending? See Fed’s Zero Rate Policy Sparking Complaints and Banks are Not Lending?  So What

  • Why Return to Prudent Investing or Compensation Policies When You Have a Government Guarantee?

The “Too Big to Fail” institutions have a federal guarantee if they get into trouble.  If you are socializing losses through government guarantees and leaving profits in private hands, the real world result is excessive risk taking and reckless speculation.  Merely look at the rising “value at risk” (the amount of money a firm could lose in one day of trading) at firms like Goldman Sachs and you see a microcosm of capitalism run amok.  Why not leverage up and speculate in the commodity markets when the government is the ultimate underwriter of risk?  Excessive leverage was one of the triggers for the financial crisis. These activities have returned and have possibly exceeded pre- crisis levels.

Excessive risk taking has led to record bonuses on Wall Street.  Prudence would suggest reinvesting profits in the firm instead of record payouts.  Why be prudent if the government is your guarantor?

  • On the Verge of Bankruptcy?  Why Not Raise CD rates?

If you are a financial institution in trouble, why not offer CD rates far in excess of your competition?  In a world where the FDIC effectively guarantees these CDs, there are no limits on offering CD rates to attract deposits.   Just before Washington Mutual became effectively insolvent, it offered CDs way above market. Only the taxpayers have to worry about any future losses.

Conclusion

When the government intervenes in the real economy, the laws of economics and prudent business practice are suspended.  This is all done in the name of “saving the economy.” I have highlighted some of the perverse incentives. I am sure there are more and more will develop with continued government meddling.  Is it worth it?  If I am a taxpayer underwriting financial follies, I might want to express my disapproval to my elected representatives.

GD Star Rating
loading...
  • Share/Bookmark

20
Nov 09

The Macroeconomic Picture or Connecting the Dots

In our current world of finance and economics specialization is rampant to the point of being emblematic of our age.  There are specialists in credit derivatives, traders of all stripes, equities, bonds, distressed debt, emerging markets, private equities, municipal bonds, high yield bonds, repos and a host of other financial vehicles.  Since each of these specialists operate in their own “silo” there are few big picture specialists who can look at the entire macroeconomic environment and connect the dots.   Listening to Bloomberg Radio yesterday morning, noted bank analyst Meredith Whitney returned to her bearish stance on both bank stocks and the stock market in general. Ms.Whitney said she examines all economic data.  Unfortunately, Ms Whitney is a rarity on Wall Street and in Washington.   The mantra has been “green shoots and recovery” but coverage has ignored reality.   Examine recent financial headlines which rarely make the mainstream media:

Connecting the Dots

To stem a financial collapse after the bursting of the internet bubble, the Federal Reserve dropped interest rates to near zero.  This sparked the boom in real estate and the “FIRE” economy: finance, insurance and real estate.  As a nation we exported our productive capacity off shore and we embraced a real estate, retail and service economy.  This bubble burst in 2008. The cycle of ever rising asset prices and credit prices ended.

The above headlines suggest an economy seriously unbalanced with collapsing commercial and residential real estate prices, already high and increasing unemployment, contracting bank and consumer credit, trade imbalances, deficits at the federal and state level, collapsing personal finances and falling tax collections.

Too Much Debt and Too Little Income

The hangover from a decade of financial excess is too much debt and too little income to support that debt.  The rest is mere commentary.  Trying to re-inflate the FIRE economy bubble will ultimately prove to be costly and futile.  The country needs more people like Meredith Whitney who recognize that the emperor has no clothes and realize that there will be continuing tough times ahead.

As they used to say on Hill Street Blues:  “Hey let’s be careful out there.”

GD Star Rating
loading...
  • Share/Bookmark