Posts Tagged: Henry Paulson


11
Oct 10

You Say You Want a Revolution Part II

In my last blog we described the seeds of the next American revolution.  See You Say You Want a Revolution Part I. Paul Farrell outlined the incompetence of the Republican and Democratic parties and the greed of Wall Street.  One institution targeted for dissolution is the Federal Reserve:

…the Fed cannot survive. Why? Not because the Fed is at the center of America’s economic problems, beyond repair, a dying institution. But because the Fed is a pawn of Wall Street’s Happy Conspiracy, which is incapable of seeing the train wreck that it set up.

This out-of-control, conspiracy of greedy Wall Street bankers, corporate CEOs, corrupt politicians and Forbes 400 billionaires will, in the near future, trigger the third catastrophic meltdown of the 21st century, a collapse that paradoxically can transform America into a new, stronger post-capitalist economy … but only after a revolution and brutal class warfare. But few will talk about what’s coming.  The Fed is Dead, Maybe by 2012

You Should Always Tell the Truth

Nassim Taleb, author of The Black Swan, believes that the Federal Reserve will not exist in 25 years.   Mr. Farrell demurs, warning that it will happen much sooner as fallout from the second American Revolution.

It’s inevitable: Wall Street banks control the Federal Reserve System; it’s their personal piggy bank. They’ve already done so much damage, yet have more control than ever.

Warning: That’s a set-up. They will eventually destroy capitalism, democracy, and the dollar’s global reserve-currency status. They will self-destruct before 2035 … maybe as early as 2012 … most likely by 2020.  The Fed is Dead, Maybe by 2012

Taleb uses two simple formulas to determine the veracity and competence of our politicians, business leaders and academicians: do they tell the truth (not half truths or other deceptions) and prior to 2008 did they foresee the financial crisis?

Taleb’s view is that you cannot trust anyone in government. He cites two US Treasury Secretaries:  Timothy Geithner and Henry Paulson.  Geithner cherry picks dates and misleads about the economic recovery.  Paulson warned President Bush about the financial crisis in 2006, but failed to warn the public.  Worse, Paulson’s public declarations in 2007 and 2008 led the investing public to believe in the strength of the US economy and that the housing bubble was well contained.  The Fed Chairman, Ben Bernanke, made the same deceptive statements.

Turning to economists, Taleb focuses on Paul Krugman who never anticipated the financial crisis.  Moreover, his economic proscription of exchanging private debt for public debt only creates moral hazard. Our grandchildren will be burdened with our debt.

He heaps special scorn upon President Obama and the Senate for reappointing Bernanke after his miserable track record.  Bernanke remains in his position despite failing to revive the economy.  Taleb believes that Bernanke is a shaman, “whose methods make ‘homeopath and alternative healers look empirical and scientific.”  The Fed is Dead, Maybe by 2012

A Recipe for Collapse

Charles Hugh Smith in The Recipe for Collapse,  supports Mr. Farrell’s proposition that we are heading for another collapse.  The following mixture all but assures a coming collapse: central planning (the Federal Reserve); encouraging speculation through reducing the safe return on capital to below the inflation rate (zero interest rate policy); creating bubbles in real estates, stocks, bonds and commodities (e.g., nine million vacant homes); corrupting the power elites to continue financial skimming and speculation (watering down the financial reform bill); concentrating wealth and power in a small elite; promoting debt and leverage so that the economy will collapse with ever increasing amounts of debt; continuing to promote failed economic remedies (stimulus, zero interest rates); making corruption, cronyism, embezzlement, insider trading and fraud endemic; concentrating media in a few hands; devoting an increasing share to internal security or military adventures; making an ever greater number of laws hampering productive enterprise, and raising the hopes of the general population that they can get rich quickly (housing, stocks) only to have their dreams deflated or dashed.

So You Want a Revolution

The Administration, the media and the financial elite are unwittingly marching down the path to revolution.  What I find most disturbing is that we re-cycle and give prominence to the same public figures that got us into this mess:  Ben Bernanke at the Federal Reserve, Timothy Geithner formerly of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and now Treasury, Barney Frank in Congress, Paul Krugman at the New York Times and a host of others.   We need some new thinking and directions, not a repetition of the same tired nostrums which have not, and probably never, worked.

So we are at the crossroads of a revolution.  Revolutions do not have to be violent.  But it would take revolution to upset the smug, intellectually and morally bankrupt status quo.  We need some leaders who regularly speak truth.  Only when we make a complete break from the past, do we have the possibility of a brighter future.

GD Star Rating
loading...
  • Share/Bookmark

2
Feb 10

Timothy Geithner and Plausible Deniability

Congressional hearings often make wonderful theater.  Last week at the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, the American public heard testimony from Timothy Geithner, former head of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and now US Treasury Secretary and Henry Paulson, former US Treasury Secretary.  Both men’s testimony relied on one premise: if we did not bail out AIG and pay its counterparties 100 cents on the dollar, the financial world as we know it would have ended,  i.e., the US would have plunged into a second Great Depression.  By written statement, Fed Reserve chair Ben Bernanke informed the Committee of his full support for this decision.  In person, Henry Paulson agreed.  However, both men said they had nothing to do with the decision.  Further, Mr. Geithner testified that he had relied on his staff or details of the bailout.  And even further than that, he later distanced himself from the decision whether nor not to disclose the details of the bailout. America was treated to the concept of “plausible deniability.”

Plausible Deniability

Working in a corporation one gets a firsthand look at the concept of “plausible deniability.”  Plausible deniability works something like this: a crisis starts; an important decision must be made; a senior executive is charged with making a decision; the senior executive delegates much of the preparatory work to  staff or a trusted lieutenant; the staff or trusted lieutenant ultimately makes a recommendation which later becomes “The Decision. “  If or when something goes wrong in the future, the senior executive denies involvement and places the blame on the staff or the trusted lieutenant.  Almost every time, the superiors of the senior executive accept this scenario.  The senior executive survives.

Let’s Get Real

Harry Truman said “the buck stops here,” meaning that the most senior executive has ultimate responsibility for a decision.  Perhaps with President Clinton or at some time it became fashionable for the senior person to distance himself from the decision so that he would have plausible deniability.  Further, it was expected that subordinates would “throw themselves on their swords” to preserve their boss.

It stretches credulity that the three most senior financial executives in government, The Chairman of the Federal Reserve, the President of the New York Federal Reserve and the Treasury Secretary did not know the intimate details of the AIG bailout.  At stake at the time was $62b of taxpayer money to effect this phase of the bailout.  All three men agree that if the bailout did not take place financial Armageddon would have ensued.

More is expected of our public servants. We appointed these individuals because of their unique skills, judgment and character. Apparently, these individuals were unavailable in the AIG crisis to make critical decisions.  Based on these stated actions, I deplore the confirmation of Ben Bernanke.  Moreover, I would ask for the resignation of Timothy Geithner.

It is time that high level government officials took responsibility and become the watchdog of the public purse. Trying to blame subordinates should elicit the response from the public: “that dog won’t hunt!”

GD Star Rating
loading...
  • Share/Bookmark