Posts Tagged: inflation


13
Feb 11

Restoring Federal Reserve Accountability

In We Cannot Separate Politics and Economics. And Those Who Speak Out Against Bad Policy are Helping the Economy…And Our Individual Investments; Washington’s blog makes an important point about the poor state of economic analysis.  Modern economists naively analyze the economy without regard to the interplay of politics:

Some people criticize the injection of politics into economic discussions.

But economic historians tell us that economists used to understand and accept that economics is wholly interrelated with politics, and that politics affects our economy. They note that modern economists have artificially tried to somehow separate the two, like Descartes tried to separate the mind from the body.

Indeed, the father of modern economics – Adam Smith – talked a lot about politics in relation to economics. Washington’s Blog

Recognizing the inter-connectedness of politics and economics, the discipline was originally referred to as “political economy.”  In fact Georgetown University has a political economy major.

The blog goes on to criticize the multi-trillion dollar expenditures on the Iraq and Afghanistan wars and the consequent deleterious effect on the economy.  Moreover, for the last ten years we have undermined any semblance of a free market by living under a state of economic emergency.   We have massively lost trust in government.  With the financial crisis and lack of prosecutions the public has also lost trust in our financial institutions, the SEC and the Justice Department.  But what is missing from this excellent analysis is the role of the Federal Reserve.

The Federal Reserve: Earnest Technocrats or Politicians in Disguise?

The Federal Reserve has a limited statutory mandate: maintain full employment and price stability.  Under Ben Bernanke the Federal Reserve has gone far afield from that mandate:

We now have a fourth branch, the imperial Federal Reserve.  Without our permission, this rogue branch is dictating economic policy for the United States.  Mission creep is taking the Fed from its dual mandates of employment and stable prices to its own self-proclaimed mandate: economic stimulation (in direct contravention of the views of the newly elected Congress and the American public) and dollar devaluation.   In QE2 it also has taken on the role of guardian of stock market prices. See Who Elected Ben Bernanke?

Bernanke has crossed into the realm of political decision making:

  • Ultra low short-term interest rates have fattened bank profits at the expense of retirees, pension funds and insurance companies.
  • QE2 money printing has set off a speculative binge in commodities hurting consumers.
  • QE2 has hurt the value of the dollar, favoring US exporters over foreign importers.
  • Higher import prices have hurt consumers since we have de-industrialized America.  Consequently, we are dependent on cheap foreign-made goods.
  • QE2 has exported inflation to foreign countries. Revolutions in the governments of our allies, Egypt and Tunisia, are not a coincidence.  Higher food prices in impoverished economies are a breeding ground for unrest. See A Perfect Storm in Egypt
  • QE2 has set off currency wars and raised global tensions with China, the EU countries, Brazil, and emerging economies.
  • QE2 permits the Federal Reserve to purchase a major portion of newly issued Treasury debt.  This permits continuance of unprecedented federal budget deficits.  Thus, Congress avoids making the necessary tough budget cutting decisions.
  • QE2 has also perversely raised the all important 10-year Treasury note yield by 1.25%, thus increasing mortgage rates and retarding any housing recovery.

Holding the Federal Reserve Accountable

The Federal Reserve cherishes its vaunted independence.  This independence was predicated on adhering to a technocratic, apolitical agenda of controlling money supply to provide a background for economic growth.  The Federal Reserve is now overtly operating in a political role: it determines winners and losers in the economy (banks favored over savers), the value of the dollar (exporters favored over importers and consumers), and financial speculators (the wealthy over the middle class and Wall Street over Main Street).  It is also interfering in foreign policy, exporting inflation in key commodities to foreign countries (many of which are our allies) and triggering a potential currency war and protectionism.  Finally, Dr. Bernanke recently lectured Congress about deficits: a topic far afield from the role of the Federal Reserve. See Bernanke Makes Sure Fed Reminds Congress Deficits Bigger Than QE2

Let me repeat: Ben Bernanke was not elected and he is not a benign technocrat.  Politics and economics are intertwined.   He was wrong about the housing crisis, the financial crisis and QE1.  Our politicians must rein him in and restore economic policy control to elected officials.

Some would argue that encroaching on Federal Reserve independence would undermine the institution hurting economic policy.  The military is under the control of civilian political leadership and there is no uproar over “military independence.”  If the military can be under political control then the Fed can be too.  The real issue is accountability and the Federal Reserve has little, if any accountability.  Conversely, it will also make our profligate elected officials equally accountable for economic policy.

It will not be easy or elegant, but it will begin to restore trust in our government and economy.

GD Star Rating
loading...
  • Share/Bookmark

24
Nov 10

Who Pays?

Early in my career I learned a valuable lesson.  In the course of a transaction, a question arose as to how much in pension assets were to be transferred to the buyer’s plan.  The pensions for employees transferring with the business were guaranteed and never in jeopardy.  The only question was who would pay to fully fund the pension plan, the buyer, one large company or the seller, another large company?

Much disinformation exists about the roots and causes of our current financial crisis.   Republicans blame Democrats, and vice versa.  Banks blame government policy, and vice versa.  Homeowners blame lenders, and vice versa.   The US government faults the failure of the Chinese to let the yuan rise in value.  The blame game is endless.

Government and its supporters have promised financial salvation in little understood programs such as TARP, TALF, QE1 and QE2.  By design these programs are meant to confuse and mislead legislators and the public.  The pseudo science of Federal Reserve and Treasury Keynesian technocrats has produced few if any promised results.  I believe that these programs have been deliberately designed to hide their designers’ true agendas: socializing losses among taxpayers, and allowing malefactors to keep profits and undeserved, out-sized executive bonuses.  Non-stop government propaganda again supports keeping the truth from the public.  See 1984 in 2010. What is missing from the discussion is the proper allocation of both blame and responsibility.  And logically flowing from that absent conversation would be the fundamental question now:  who should pay?

Ireland’s current financial crisis foreshadows what could happen here.

Ireland Pays and Pays

After steadfastly considering a bailout, the Irish government stated that it intended to negotiate a bailout package with the EU and the IMF.  Reports indicate the package could exceed $85 billion Euros ($149b).  The government would take over one bank and take a majority stake in another bank.  Report Asia One News

The central bankers have extracted financial concessions from the Irish government.  Ireland must operate under an austerity budget with increased property and taxes on the wealthy coupled with a ten percent or more budget cut each year for the next four years.  It is expected that the current government will be dissolved and new elections held.

How Did Ireland Get Into This Mess?

Like many economies, Ireland’s recent prosperity was built on a real estate boom.

Much of its growth was built around the property market, but since 2008 this has suffered a dramatic collapse.

House values have fallen by between 50% and 60%, and bad debts – mainly in the form of loans to developers – have built up in the country’s main banks. This almost wrecked the institutions, leaving them needing bailing out by the government at a cost of 45bn euros (£39bn; $60.1bn).

This has opened a huge hole in the Irish government’s finances – which will see it run a budget deficit equivalent to 32% of GDP this year. See BBC Q&A: Irish Republic Finances

When the property market collapsed the government stepped in to save its banks:

As several of the banks have been part-nationalised, most of their massive debt is now actually government debt.

And the great majority of this debt is owed to foreign lenders, which the Irish banks (and therefore the Irish government) simply cannot afford to default on. See BBC Q&A: Irish Republic Finances

Thus, the government saved foreign holders of Irish debt and the private Irish bank bondholders.  The losers are the Irish taxpayer and their economy.

The US Taxpayer Also Pays and Pays

Seemingly innocuous words and phrases such as “bailout,” “government guarantee,” “quantitative easing” or “Troubled Asset Relief Program” hide the true nature of the governmental objective.  Whether it is Bank of America, General Motors, General Electric, Citicorp or Chrysler, these are enormous businesses that made bad decisions.  The litany is long and undistinguished: lending irresponsibly (no income, no job loans); using too much leverage (Bear and Lehman); selecting the wrong products (SUVs during the oil price crisis) or misleading accounting (GE pension accounting).  All of these were private businesses pursuing profits.  Shareholders and bondholders of these enterprises willingly invested, hoping for share appreciation, dividends and interest payments. They understood the risk that businesses could go bankrupt, or dividends and interest suspended.

The rallying cry of “save the banks” or “save GM” is really a way of transferring losses from the business and its investors to the taxpayer.  With QE2 we face the prospect of the taxpayer/consumer paying the hidden tax of higher inflation.  Just after QE2 was announced the Fed revealed its true purpose:  saving the banks yet again by requiring a second round of bank stress tests.

A Moment of Morality

Karl Denninger provides an unvarnished view of the morality of the Irish bailout, the parallels to the US and what must happen:

Looting becomes impossible to sustain eventually.  Now the Irish Government thinks that the Irish people should pay for being robbed!

It’s not enough to get ripped off – now the government wants to tax the people to pay for the stealing that they allowed to happen in the first place.

This is no different than what happened in Greece or the United States for that matter, and it will continue to happen until the people stand up and refuse to accept it.

Further, and far more importantly, shifting the bad debt around doesn’t get rid of it.  It simply tries to impose the cost on the nation as a tax – a tax that cannot be paid, and won’t be paid.

To the Irish people: You must choose between putting a stop to this – no matter what it takes to enforce that demand – and literal debt peonage and servitude imposed upon you for the sins of a handful of rich bastards that robbed all of you. See Another Lie Exposed: Ireland

Behind all these fancy financial terms and maneuverings there is a moral dimension.   Judeo-Christian theology is based on concepts of reward and punishment.  Capitalism follows the same path.  Rewarding financial elites who misbehaved, and punishing hardworking, prudent taxpayers, runs contrary to a moral core.  The programmatic maneuverings blur the distinction between right and wrong.  Further, from an economic viewpoint it encourages moral hazard, that is, risk taking without fear of punishment.  Ultimately, the populace refuses to accept this new burdensome status quo and real trouble starts.

Until now, we in the US have accepted the status quo that we must save banks, auto companies and insurance outfits and further burden taxpayers.   Has anyone in authority explained why, or offered any other alternatives?  If we don’t ask these questions soon, we face a weekend like Ireland is experiencing right now:  looking down the gun barrel of austerity and increased taxes or worse.

GD Star Rating
loading...
  • Share/Bookmark

11
Nov 10

1984 in 2010

In George Orwell’s 1984, protagonist Winston Smith works in the Ministry of Truth.  In Airstrip One in the mythical Oceana, the Ministry serves as a perpetual propaganda machine exercising public mind control.  Winston eventually rebels against “Big Brother.”  Ultimately, he is captured, tortured and “re-educated.”

Today’s media subject us to a constant barrage of spin, messaging, falsehood and half-truth.  We have traveled from the “No Spin Zone” to the “24/7 Spin Zone.”   Dangerously, it is our own government controlling and propagating news and messages:

1.      Spin:  QE2 is designed to meet the two Federal Reserve goals of high employment and low inflation.   [Bernanke op-ed Washington Post]  Truth:  Revealed later in the op-ed piece is that QE2 supports stock prices.  Moreover, the real likely beneficiaries of QE2 are our failing large banks.

2.      Spin: QE2 will not result in the Federal Reserve monetizing our national debt.  [Bernanke June 3, 2009 testimony before Congress]:   Truth:  “For the next eight months, the nation’s central bank will be monetizing the federal debt.”  Richard Fisher, President of the Dallas Federal Reserve Bank   Speech November 8, 2010

3.       Spin:  “Structural unemployment is not increasing.”  Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Report Is Structural Employment on the Rise?    Truth:  In The New Reality: Permanent Job Loss , we explored the new labor force dynamics.  Noted economist David Rosenberg estimates that we have a permanent job loss of 6.2m workers.  With slow revenue growth, outsourcing, skills mismatches and tight credit conditions unemployment will remain high.

4.      Spin:  “Jobs Expand by 151,000.”   Bureau of Labor Statistics Report Truth:  This statistic is patently misleading. Labor force participation is dropping (58%): more workers are no longer participating in the labor force (36%) and therefore are not counted.  Moreover, the BLS uses the birth-death model which fictitiously creates jobs based on demographics.

5.      Spin:  Inflation is low (below 2%),  therefore Social Security cost of living adjustment does not apply.  Truth:  The Federal Reserve uses a 2.2% inflation deflator when calculating Gross Domestic Product.  Since the beginning of the summer the following commodities jumped in price: corn (71%); oil (24%); oats (106%); wheat (67%); soy (44%); copper (47%); gold (21%) and silver (48%).  Commodity price increases have passed through to higher retail prices in every sector. Source:  Karl Denninger

6.      Spin: After performing stress tests on 19 banks, secretary Geithner declared the banking system fundamentally sound.  Truth:  Even after TARP, TALF, government guarantees and other programs have exceeded last year’s number of bank failures.  And this with two months of the year to go.  See Tracking Bank Failures: 2010 Exceed 2009 Bank Failures. More takeunders like that of Wilmington Trust are certainly possible, and that bank discounted its stock by 40%.  See A Canary in the Mine

7.      Spin:  The Administration has assured us that the brewing mortgage foreclosure crisis is merely a paperwork problem.   Truth:  Foreclosuregate raises a number of significant problems related to mortgage securitization.  Problems range from poor underwriting standards to outright fraud in court filings.   See This Magic Moment, Postscript to Foreclosuregate

8.      Spin:  The Treasury Secretary assures our trading partners and us that the US wants a strong dollar.   Truth:  QE2 has weakened the dollar and enraged our trading partners.  Since summer 2010,  the dollar has declined 16%.

9.      Spin:  the economy is recovering.   Truth:  Interest rates been held at zero percent for an extended period of time.  If the economy is recovering, why do we even need QE2?

10.  Spin:  Initial unemployment claims for the week of November 6, 2010, dropped by 24k .  Truth:  Unfortunately, that series has been revised downward from the previous week 36 times out of 42 weeks in 2010.  Similarly, continuing claims for unemployment insurance have been revised downward 42 out of 44 weeks.  Finally, without BLS adjustments the initial claim report would have shown a loss of 38k jobs.  Jobless Claims at 435K on Expectation of 450k, To Be Revised Worse Next Week

Becoming Winston Smith

The US Ministry of Truth has been on a concerted campaign to ignore or distort economic statistics to convince the American public that the recession has ended and a recovery is well under way.

The newest object of government attention is the stock market, with the goal of boosting prices to induce a recovery.  Charles Hugh Smith estimates that the Fed’s QE2 efforts since June have resulted in a net loss to the US economy of $4.6T.  That loss includes the 19% gain in the stock market.  See Fed’s QE2 Misadventure Costs U.S. Households $4.6 Trillion

We have been so conditioned to hear lies and spin that we can no longer discern the truth.  We have all become like 1984s Winston Smith, the wayward and tragic civil servant. So far, no politician has the guts to stand up and say we have real structural problems in the economy. It will take more than hope and spin to solve our problems.  There needs to be some period of economic contraction, debt write off, fiscal and monetary austerity and probably another stock market crash before a real recovery can happen.  Who will have the courage to tell us an unpopular, unspun truth?

GD Star Rating
loading...
  • Share/Bookmark

24
Dec 09

Tis’ the Season for Deflation

Gold and commodities have soared. Economists are worried about the Federal Reserve’s creation of excess money.  Since we are in the middle of the Christmas season, I want to forward my views on deflation and inflation at “street level.”  This post will never earn me a guest lecturer invitation at Wharton or Harvard, but it is a look at what is really happening at street level.  Let’s call it the Single Malts I Like Every day (“SMILE”) Index.

A Trip to the Malt Shop

Visiting my favorite beverage shop in New York is always a revelatory experience.  Perhaps because of the large sales volume, New York retailers can extract large discounts from their distributors.  Some examples:

  • Lagavulin 16-year old – $47.99 (nationally $89.99, highest price $107)
  • Talisker 25-year old – $89.99 (nationally $267.23, highest price $420)
  • Oban 18-year old Limited Edition – $79.99 (nationally $139.99, highest price $154.35)

The New York Lagavulin wars are particularly instructive:

  • Nine months ago, my favorite store priced Lagavulin at $56.99.
  • A competitor priced Lagavulin at $54.99.
  • My store matched the price.
  • Later my store dropped the price to $49.99: and
  • On my most recent trip my store dropped the price to $47.99.
  • In researching this post, I found a New York –based on line site selling Lagavulin for $45.46 (NY delivery only).

Talisker, Lagavulin and Oban are Diageo (“DEO“) products, a major scotch producer (Johnny Walker, J&B, Classic Malts, etc).  Despite a weak dollar, Diageo is having difficulty selling premium whiskies and is heavily discounting.  Remember that these scotches target a “luxury market” consumer supposedly impervious to the current recession. Apparently that is not the case.

Street Level Deflation

I also noticed diminished foot traffic walking around mid-town New York in the midst of the Christmas shopping season.  Lord and Taylor at 3 PM on the afternoon of the 17th of December looked empty. Broadway shows at the TKTS booth were available at half price for almost all Broadway shows.  High end restaurants now regularly have specially priced prix-fixe menus for both lunch and dinner.

Even coffee is affected by deflation.  Dunkin’ Donuts originally priced its premium coffee at $10 per pound.  It has run a perpetual sale in its shops selling two pounds of coffee for $12.99.  There are few retailers who can maintain premium pricing, and many are resorting to deep discounts.

Finally, I strolled the 47th Street jewelry district.  I like to call this glittery block between Fifth and Sixth Avenues the “Street of Dreams.” Again, there was little foot traffic, the stores were empty and sales people looked bored.

Inflation or Deflation?

My gut instinct is that deflation is prevailing.  We have a consumer economy predicated on purchases of luxury, non essential goods. Plasma televisions, laptops and single malt scotch whiskies are hardly the necessities of life. OK, strike that, maybe Lagavulin is a necessity.  Food shopping at my local Shop Rite store, I noticed a pile of 42 inch plasma televisions on sale for $329.  At the same time the store was marking down a famous French premium cheese from almost $10 to $2.99.  Certain staples may temporarily rise in price, but it looks like consumers have “pulled in their belts” and will only buy even premium goods at heavily discounted prices.  That spells DEFLATION.  I guess just take advantage of the discounts and SMILE.

GD Star Rating
loading...
  • Share/Bookmark