Posts Tagged: jobless recovery


14
Jun 10

Caution! Spin May Be Harmful to Your Portfolio

CNBC, Fox Business and Bloomberg feed us a steady stream of bullish analysis.  Barron’s, The New York Times and the Wall Street Journal push more of the same, and amplify the bullish message: buy stocks now, they are undervalued.  However, these analysts have been consistently wrong.  A new McKinsey study analyzes this phenomenon:

“Analysts have been persistently over-optimistic for 25 years,” a stretch that saw them peg earnings growth at 10 percent to 12 percent a year when the actual number was ultimately 6 percent. “On average,” the researchers note, “analysts’ forecasts have been almost 100 percent too high,” even after regulations were enacted to weed out conflicts and improve the rigor of their calculations. …[A]nalysts have been forced to lower their estimates after it became apparent they had set them too high. See For Analysts Things are Always Looking Up.

Why the persistent bullishness?  Human beings are optimistic and want to believe in good outcomes.  And why not?  When the markets rise, Wall Street investors make more money. Bullishness comports with the Administration’s political agenda to make Americans feel better.   When Americans are bullish about the economy and spend more money, they set the stage to create a virtuous self-reinforcing economic recovery.

Unfortunately, this economic recovery is different from previous post-war recoveries and does not respond in the same ways.

What are Stocks Worth?

David Goldman in Inner Workings writes some of the most incisive commentary on the markets.  He believes that stocks may trade in a range of Dow 8,000 to 12,000 and at the moment, at Dow 10,000 probably reflects an accurate value for the market.  However, he is worried about a “double dip”  recession, which is a renewed downturn in the second half of this year and cites five areas of concern:

  1. Fiscal austerity and bank failures in Europe could transmit economic weakness to our banks and economy.
  2. US consumers will continue to be under pressure from poor employment prospects and a declining housing market.  Focusing on a housing recovery, Goldman pours cold water on that thought:

The notion of a housing recovery seems fanciful when America has only 25 million households with two parents and two or more children, but 72 million housing units with three or more bedrooms. The baby boomers bought far more house than they required and hope to sell it at a profit; now they will retire to smaller quarters and the overhang of large-lot single family homes may take decades to work off.  See What are Stocks Worth?

3. Fiscal austerity is already taking place at the state and municipal level.

4. Pressures are increasing to reign in federal deficits.Asia will not turn out to be the growth engine leading the US and the world out of recession.

5. Analysts are underestimating the negative wealth effect from losses in the housing and equity markets.

The Great Correction

Bill Bonner, founder of the Daily Reckoning, calls our current economic environment the Great Correction. See Heavenly Recovery or Hellish Correction? We are paying the price of becoming overly indebted.  The “recovery” spotted by so many pundits differs from all post-war corrections:

  1. We would have seen a recovery in jobs.  Since the beginning of the correction 8.2m jobs have been lost and none recovered.
  2. Inflation would have increased.
  3. Money supply would have increased and people would have been borrowing, spending and investing.
  4. Housing would be on the upswing with prices recovering.

We have spent trillions of dollars to try and stop a correction and we are failing.

Think More, React Less

Bonner and Goldman are two of the most incisive and prescient economic and financial analysts and are cautioning investors.  While I do not give investment advice on this blog, perhaps this is one of those times where we need to turn off financial television, put down the newspaper and ignore the financial markets.  The spin can make us both dizzy and poorer.

GD Star Rating
loading...
  • Share/Bookmark

26
Nov 09

Can We Continue the Status Quo?

Every so often one comes across a brilliant essay that cuts to the heart of the problem.  Writing for the Prudent Bear in “Wanted: Iconoclasts,” Martin Hutchinson identifies the rising political anger at the “partnering” of the Obama Administration and Wall Street:

In such an atmosphere, with unemployment above 10% and rising, and U.S. living standards descending inexorably towards those of the Third World, it is not surprising that the public beyond the Washington Beltway is in an iconoclastic mood. Its iconoclasm is rational, economically speaking. The tight oligopoly of Wall Street is profiting excessively from its 2008 bailout by taxpayers, with the payments to Goldman Sachs and others on the AIG credit default swaps coming to seem increasingly misguided and possibly corrupt, given Goldman Sachs’s close connection with the Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson who disbursed taxpayers’ money in such an unproductive manner. AIG and Citigroup remain in business, with even AIG Financial Products, the cause of much of 2008′s pain, still in operation. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac remain dispensing their guarantees to the housing market, noticed by the media only at the end of each quarter as they tote up their losses and demand further billions of the taxpayers’ money. The economically damaging subsidies to home purchase, diverting as they do scarce U.S. capital towards yet more unproductive housing, have just been extended both in time, for a further six months and in scope, to existing homeowners. The economic recovery, such as it is, appears to [be] sic producing almost no jobs but only an ever-widening spiral in commodity prices, affecting the costs of everything the public consumes and eroding the value of its meager savings.

Mr. Hutchison levels his criticism of the management of the financial crisis at the behavior of Obama, Bernanke and Geithner, whose knee jerk response was to maintain rather than reform system.  They chose to bolster bankrupt financial institutions at taxpayer expense. Further, they chose zero interest rate policies which punish savers and trillion dollar deficits ad infinitum which punish all taxpayers and future generations.  They created a giant irrational structure. (See Why Do All Irrational Structures Fail?).

Offering Solutions

Mr. Hutchinson does not deliver a jeremiad.  Instead, he departs from dire rants and prognostications and points to a rational way out of the ongoing crisis.  Recognizing that the current economic-political trajectory we are currently on is unsustainable, he provides policy prescriptions to end the crisis:

It will thus have become obvious that the housing market needs to be restored to a fully private market state, in which government subsidies are confined to the truly indigent. Zombie banks must be closed down, while the beneficiaries of “too big to fail” must be forced to slim down and divest operations until they are of a size where failure is conceivable. Commercial banks will simply become regional entities, whose failure would damage a regional economy but not the entire financial system. The trading behemoths will be broken into several competitors, whose market share will be too small for them to profit from “insider information” about market flows – a modest transactions tax will also reduce trading’s dominance. Home mortgages will once again be granted locally, with derivatives and securitization technology used only to prevent cost squeezes in high-growth areas. The obvious cost reductions in health-care, eliminating the current system’s cross-subsidizations, will be legislated to reduce the sector’s oppressive cost growth. Public expenditure generally will be put on a strict diet, with expansionist foreign policy ended, both in its belligerent and its globalist forms.  Finally, monetary policy will set interest rates at a level that rewards savers properly and prevents bubbles.

Conclusion

Staying on our current course of action is irrational.  Mr. Hutchinson clearly links together politics and economics.  Often economists take a narrower view, ignoring political realities.  Since this is not a normal recession and has all the hallmarks of a depression, “business as usual” policy measures taken to date have been ineffective and have deepened the crisis. There is a growing political reaction among the masses of Americans who face unemployment, inflated gasoline prices and foreclosure.  Democratic losses in recent elections were an early harbinger of that discontent.  There is still time for Obama, Bernanke and Geithner to become iconoclasts, break with orthodoxy and restore economic growth which will benefit all Americans.  Continuing the status quo will be harmful to the current ruling political class, the Wall Street elite and the economy.

GD Star Rating
loading...
  • Share/Bookmark