Posts Tagged: Naked Capitalism


18
May 10

Confidence, Savings and the Future

The first quarter 2010 savings rate dropped from 3.9 to 3.1 percent.  Given the severity of the recession, economists assumed that out of fear Americans would save more.  That has not been the case.

Theories abound for the abysmal savings rate: high unemployment, little incentive to save in a low interest rate environment, high debt levels siphoning off income, stagnant personal income and others. Yves Smith, founder of Naked Capitalism,  introduces an intriguing theory that when an economy features great income disparities, a “plutonomy” emerges wherein the over-confident wealthy spend rather than save.

Behaviors on both ends of the income spectrum no doubt played into the low-savings dynamic: wealthy people who spend heavily, and struggling average consumers who increasingly came to rely on borrowings to improve or merely maintain their lifestyle. And let us not forget: average consumers were encouraged to monetize their home equity.  See High Income Disparity Leads to Low Savings Rate

I would posit another theory.  Americans have no confidence in the future.

The “Me Generation”

Baby Boomers grew up with the threat of “the Bomb,” Viet Nam, the assassinations of President Kennedy, Robert Kennedy and Martin Luther King Jr., and drug and sexual experimentation.  Paul Begala, political adviser to Bill Clinton, Baby Boomer in Chief, commented in Esquire:

At the risk of feeding their narcissism, I believe it’s time someone stated the simple truth: The Baby Boomers are the most self-centered, self-seeking, self-interested, self-absorbed, self-indulgent, self-aggrandizing generation in American history. See The Worst Generation

Losing Confidence in the Future

Generational characteristics have macro-economic consequences.  We have discussed the “Greediest Generation” with the ethos of “I want it and I want it now.”  See The Greediest Generation – Where has Shared Sacrifice Gone? Missing from that analysis, however, is a less obvious underlying motivation:  my view is that collectively Americans have lost confidence in the future.

The Meaning of Savings

Savings requires deferring immediate gratification in order to provide for the future.   Savings requires a goal: a house purchase, kids’ college education, retirement, intergenerational wealth transfers, and future medical needs.

The task is daunting.  Society and even bogus patriotism conspire against a savings ethics: diner coffee for $1.25 or treat yourself to Starbucks?; extend yourself and buy a house now or save for a larger down payment?; buy a no-money-down car now?; take out a student loan for college or work for a few years first?  The present trumps the future.   With consumer spending representing 70 percent or more of the economy, is saving actually un-American?  And governmental policy discourages savings through ultra low interest rates, tax credits and deductions encouraging taking on debt and  consumption.

Save Some Money, Save Yourself

The siren song of indulgence and consumerism has led us directly into the path of this tornadic financial crisis.  We’ve accumulated too many houses, plasma televisions and attendant debt.  In the face of an anti-savings zeitgeist, saving money is a good idea for many reasons: a chance for personal financial autonomy, a better life for our children and grandchildren and a secure retirement. Savings requires self-sacrifice, thriftiness, a financial plan and debt avoidance.  And most of all, savings requires confidence in the future.  Lurching from crisis to crisis, dire headlines at home and abroad, house foreclosures, and high unemployment has sapped this much needed confidence.

In the end, we have always been a resilient, even optimistic people.  Let’s save some money and save ourselves.

GD Star Rating
loading...
  • Share/Bookmark

28
Dec 09

Trust Once Lost

My college history professor had an astute observation: “trust once lost cannot be easily regained.”  Naked Capitalism has two excellent posts today: “Is Blaming AAA Investors Wall Street Serving PR?” and “Has Obama Been a Success despite Suspicions of Crony Capitalism?” A common theme that both articles fail to fully articulate is– trust.  Trust is a commodity everyone now sells short.

Wall Street’s Treatment of Investors

In “Is Blaming AAA Investors Serving Wall Street PR?” Thomas Adams argues that Goldman Sachs and other clever bankers are pinning the blame on institutional investors who bought AAA-rated, collateralized debt obligations. Many of these securities turned out to be worthless. The investment banking community argues “caveat emptor,” but Adams convincingly rebuts:

The argument that the CDO market blew up because it was so complex and speculative is fundamentally flawed. Believe it or not, the bonds that caused the damage to AIG, the bond insurers, and banks were not highly speculative, high risk bonds. They were AAA securities and were supposed to be virtually free of credit risk. In many cases, they were “super senior” bonds – meaning they had another layer of protection above the AAA level to make them even safer than regular AAA bonds.

AAA securities were meant to be easily understood by any investor.  These products should not have required sophisticated analyses as Goldman and others now argue.

Adams cuts to the heart of the investment banker’s sin:

The problem with the CDO market, and a good chunk of the financial crisis, is that the participants took complex, highly volatile, highly risky and highly leveraged assets and passed a magic wand over them to turn them into AAA. Unfortunately, this process did nothing to remove the volatility, risk, complexity or leverage (in fact, the CDO made all of these worse). From the very start, the market for AAA CDO bonds backed by ABS collateral was a fraud….

Most telling is that the same investment banks selling these investments as AAA securities were simultaneously shorting the same securities to profit from their eventual default. See Banks that Bundled Bad Debt Also Bet Against It.

This is the new age of investment banking.  Would Sidney Weinberg the legendary head of Goldman Sachs bet against his own clients? I suspect not. Mr. Weinberg understood the basic value of trust.

What Price Success?

The Obama administration is extremely proud of stabilizing the economy.  In “Has Obama Been a Success Despite Suspicions of Crony Capitalism?” Edward Harrison addresses the large gap between the President’s words and deeds. Harrison bypasses Obama labels — liberal, a closet republican, technocrat — and instead examines the evidence:

The evidence, therefore, tends to demonstrate that we have witnessed an orchestrated campaign by the Bush and Obama Administrations to recapitalize too big to fail institutions by hook or by crook, bypassing Congressional approval if necessary. And when it comes to healthcare, both Congress and the White House have bent over backwards to keep the lobbyists onside. As I see it, our government has favored special interests in the past year of Obama’s tenure to our detriment.

Thus, banks or pseudo-banks are guaranteed survival (e.g. American Express, GE, Goldman Sachs and others) while Main Street (small businesses and community banks) is pushed to the back of the economic assistance line.

And consider other erosions of public trust by the Obama Administration:  an alphabet soup of federal guarantee programs, sham bank stress tests, suspended accounting rules, and favoritism toward health insurance companies and big pharmaceuticals in the current health care debate.

The Age of Cynicism

We live in an age of flawed short term thinking.  How do we make our numbers for the next quarter? How do we get through this financial crisis? How do we get a health care bill passed so we can claim victory? How do we win the 2010 elections?  Each “success” comes at a very high price.  America is a carefully woven social contract with trust as its bedrock.  But increasingly, cracks now appear in this bedrock of trust just when it is most needed.  Will public trust be completely gone when the inevitable next crisis occurs?

GD Star Rating
loading...
  • Share/Bookmark