Posts Tagged: The Beatles


26
Apr 10

Let It Be

When I find myself in times of trouble
Mother Mary comes to me
Speaking words of wisdom, let it be

And in my hour of darkness
She is standing right in front of me
Speaking words of wisdom, let it be

“Let it Be” – The Beatles

Over the years, I led or was a member of the inner circle of many high level corporate crisis teams.  A problem or crisis challenges many a senior business leader to immediate action.  Enshrined in books on leaders is the leader who embraces action rather than “thinking more and reacting less.”  The unfortunate corollary ethic is that inaction is weak, unmanly, lazy or worse.  Even more dramatically, many times, a problem creates an adrenalin rush that is antithetical to rumination or reflection.

An entire lexicon fuels this response to problems and crises.  The language itself has military connotations: we are calling general quarters; battle stations;  red alert; the bunker mentality.  We need to deploy our troops, plot a strategy or prepare a measured response.  We applaud bold action and deride thoughtfulness.

Rarely does a leader publicly pause, reflect, and ask:  “What if I do nothing…what if I let it be?

Reaction to the Financial Crisis

Both the Bush and Obama administrations overreacted to the financial crisis.  In short order, they created TARP and an alphabet soup of borrowing programs. The government then impulsively guaranteed close to $23 trillion of debt. Compounding the folly, the government became a partner in GM, Chrysler, AIG and Citicorp.  Stimulus programs barreled through Congress bringing us first time home buyer credits, “cash for clunkers,” and interest rates at or near zero.

What If?

What if the government had done nothing when the crisis exploded into the public’s conscientiousness?  We purport to be a capitalist economy whose basic tenet is simple and understandable:  reward risk that succeeds, punish risk that fails.  The necessary adjunct to this tenet makes perfect sense:  punishing failure encourages the capitalist to be careful with his assets, thus limiting misallocation of funds. Unfortunately, what has happened in the US economy is not capitalism: successful enterprises are forced to compete with failed, government propped up ones. And new capital will not be available for new enterprises.

If we did nothing it would be painful for a short period of time.  Yes, there would be hardship, unemployment and business failures. However, the self correcting nature of capitalism would mitigate the length of the hardship, as capital would rapidly re-deploy to successful and new enterprises: an economic version of “no pain, no gain.”  Instead we have persistently high unemployment, “zombie banks” afraid to lend and, compared to prior recoveries, sub optimal economic performance.

Legislative Reform

In response to problems in health care the current Administration rammed through a complex, little understood health care proposal.  We know taxes will rise dramatically.  We have no idea how costly, efficient or effective the new health care system will be.  Given typically heavy handed government involvement, I am not optimistic.   Nancy Pelosi’s comment that we need to pass the bill so we can find out what is inside is not exactly a confidence builder.

Similarly, the Administration is trying to pass another gargantuan and little understood financial reform bill.  I have been critical in other essays about the financial institutions that got us into the financial crisis, but there are laws on the books right now that would go a long way to curbing some of the excesses.  We simply have to enforce them.  Another simple fix: reinstate Glass Steagall, which separates commercial banking from the securities business.

Stop the Committees Who Saved the World

In 1999, Time Magazine featured Robert Rubin, Alan Greenspan and Lawrence Summers as the Committee who Save the World from a global financial meltdown. What if there had been no Committee to Save the World?  A smaller failure in 1999 might have led to a more chastened financial sector.  Perhaps sub-prime lending, overbuilding in residential housing and commercial real estate,  the 2008 stock market meltdown and now the potential for sovereign debt defaults in Greece, Spain, Dubai and other countries would not have taken place.

Our current “Committee to Save the World” (Geithner, Bernanke and Summers) is certainly falling short of the mark. Perhaps our bold men of action should be a lot less bold, a lot more thoughtful, reflective and yes, inactive.  Might we all be better off?  In the immortal words of the Liverpool Philosophy Society (AKA the Beatles) could we not just “Let It Be?”

GD Star Rating
loading...
  • Share/Bookmark

8
Dec 09

War on Prudence

Dear Prudence, won’t you come out to play
Dear Prudence, greet the brand new day

Dear Prudence” – The Beatles

Lately, “prudence” is a virtue which has been in short supply.  Prudence is defined as “care, caution, and good judgment, as well as wisdom in looking ahead….”  This virtue has fallen into such disrepute that the American political and financial establishment have undertaken a war on prudence.  Closely allied to prudence are the virtues of thrift and savings.  Alas, these two handmaidens have also fallen on hard times.

Ignoring this virtue will only prolong the recession and economic malaise.

How We Got Into the Current Mess

Economic policy makers have exceptionally short memories.  We are in financial crisis because Americans took on too much debt and over consumed housing, autos, plasma televisions and stocks.  Americans also failed to save. Wall Street behavior made the crisis worse though reckless lending, highly leveraged trading and esoteric derivatives.

In short, we spent and borrowed too much and did not have the incomes to support the residual debt load.  We entered into what the late economist Hyman Minsky referred to as Stage 3 Ponzi finance.  That is, lenders knew that the debt could not be repaid based on the borrower’s income, yet they speculated on being repaid from presumed, ever increasing asset appreciation. For a longer discussion see Hoisington Investment Management, Quarterly Review and Outlook, 3rd Quarter 2009

Have the past two years ended the Ponzi finance system?

Back Doing Business at the Same Old Stand

The Obama and Bush administrations faced clear policy choices. Government could have encouraged savings, debt repayment and reductions in consumption.  Un-payable debts would have defaulted and yielded whatever the market would bear in negotiated settlements or bankrupt proceedings.  The choice would have been painful.  But markets and the economy would have reset.  Prudence on a personal and national level would have been restored.

Government’s alternate choice is now clear: reflate the bubble economy so we can party again as if it were 2005.  Mark to market accounting was suspended.  The Fed bought mortgage backed securities and other dubious debts at or near full value.  The large banks, credit card companies, GMAC, AIG and others were bailed out.  Where was Prudence?  Nowhere to be found!

Keeping interest rates at near zero punished the thrifty and encouraged an ill-equipped public to return to an overvalued stock market and speculate in commodities or high yield debt instruments.  On the consumption side the government encouraged home purchases through tax credits for new homes and cash for clunkers.

Prudence in Hiding on Wall Street

Prudence remains in hiding on Wall Street.  After accepting (and we now learn needing) government funds and guarantees, Wall Street is back to high risk, highly leveraged trading.  Goldman Sachs lost money on only one day in the last quarter.  Instead of thanking taxpayers by demonstrating proportionality and humility in compensation practices, Wall Street will pay itself record bonuses this year.  Perhaps the prudent course would be for these firms to reduce compensation levels and retain some of these record profits before the next storm.   In addition, why not force executives to have some personal risk through mandatory deferrals of compensation to incent more prudent long term behaviors.

Sometimes it is Characterological

Prudence is one of those old-fashioned values that have fallen out of favor.  Prudence requires delayed gratification, the acceptance of occasional loss and the accumulation of wealth slowly based on hard work and careful consumption.  But our current government policy is a reflection of us:  wanting a “quick fix” and a “do over” for the imprudent who lent and invested recklessly.  In sparing Wall Street pain, we have managed to inflict pain on the entire American economy: barely any growth in GDP, unemployment still at 10% and ever growing deficits which will tax future generations.

Maybe when the current course of action totally fails, we can get Dear Prudence to come out and play.

GD Star Rating
loading...
  • Share/Bookmark